Originally Posted by Edwin
I am not that sure about your conclusion...
What I am missing from your story is how your wife was so sure.
It could be that she is able to generate this feeling of inevitability in what's going to happen, thus shaping and rearranging the world to have the letter waiting for her at the exact time of her arrivel, but it could also be that she picked up some "vibe" of things about to happen by which she somehow knew when and where she had to be in order for the occurrance to take place. Kind of like being "in the right time, in the right place".
|
I understand your point, but no, that was probably not the case. Let me try to illustrate why.
There was a physicist engaged in a debate about the possibility of a particular event occurring. To drive home his point he asked, "What would be the effect if, for one instant, every electron in every single atom that made up our moon happened to synch their orbits up in precisely the same direction at the exact same instant in time?"
With some brilliant equations he demonstrated beyond any doubt that the resulting torsion would rip the moon away from the gravitational pull of Earth and send it careening off into space. Thus he said, from a purely mathematical point of view, it is within the realm of possibility that we will one day see our moon leave us in this manner. In other words, mathematically speaking, it
could happen.
But what does that same math say about whether or not such a thing actually
will happen?
Using more equations he demonstrated such an alignment would not occur during the estimated lifetime so far of our universe. In fact it would not occur even in a time period equivalent to the total estimated lifetime of the universe. What's more, if we took the total estimated lifetime of the universe and multiplied it by the largest number of which we can concieve and then lined those periods of time up consecutively, they would still not even approach the amount of time required before such a lunar event will occur.
In short, while it mathematically
could happen, statistically speaking, it never
will happen. Some events will simply never materialize because the factors necessary to bring them about are statistically improbable, essentially to a near infinite degree, effectively turning such an event into a practical impossibility.
My wife's experience falls into such a category. It may not be quite as improbable as that postulated lunar event, but its quite high up that same ladder.
The check with the envelope was addressed by the Dept. of Treasury to an address in Florida. It was not forwarded by anyone, either privately or within the postal system officially. What are the statistical chances that very envelope would instead find itself going to Washington State instead?
Furthermore, there are hundreds if not thousands of Post Office branches in Washington State. What are the chances this piece of mail addressed to a home in Florida would not only end up on the other side of the country, but would go to the exact Post Office in the exact town that serviced her former home 9 months earlier? Multiply these two factors and the statistical odds approach non-existence.
But suppose we give the universe the benefit of the doubt and say that somehow, through circumstances no one understands, as unlikely as it was, it happened. Alright, then one must next ask the question, if the envelope was not involved in any sort of forwarding procedure, what are the chances that it would float somewhere in limbo for a full month in that system, especially with the strict regulations of the Treasury Dept. requiring all mailings from them which cannot be delivered as addressed must be returned immediately to the Treasury? Again, the likelihood of such happening is very remote.
To assess the statistical probability you would need to multiply the chances of that mail going to Washington State (with no forwarding of mail of any kind involved,) times the chances it would arrive at that one exact Post Office, times the chances a piece of US Government mail would float in limbo in the postal system for a full month in direct contradiction to all regulations. When you multiply all these factors you arrive at a probability so small it is almost beyond measure. But this is just the beginning.
Next you have to ask what the odds are of my wife picking that particular morning to take off work to go in search of this errant piece of mail. You would have to multiply that times the chances of her getting to that Post Office at just the moment she did so that she could get in line and experience an extended wait just so she could receive service exactly when she did. This would need to be multiplied by the odds of the postal worker checking around the office and ending up going into the back to intercept the delivery driver as he was returning from his morning's run carrying the envelope in question, and doing so within just a few seconds one way or the other so that she did not miss him as he was taking that envelope to the sorting area so it could be sent back to the government. Multiply all these things together and then multiply them again times that astronomically small chance noted above that the mail would ever have gotten to that Post Office in Washington State in the first place, and you have a probability so infinitesimally small it almost doesn't exist.
So, Edwin, that's why I say no, she didn't just intuit something that was happening ala ESP or some such thing. What happened simply couldn't have happened; not by any understanding we have of reality. The possibility of such an event ever occurring is virtually zero, therefore there was no event for her to intuit.
And yet...it happened. Applying Occam's Razor, you have to ask yourself, if she didn't intuit an impossible event, then how did the event come about? The reasonable explanation is that somehow she "caused" it; she manifest it in some way that lies outside of all accepted "real world" possibilities. As unlikely as this sounds it is infinitely more probable than the alternative.
The key to the whole event seems to have been her absolute, unswerving knowledge that she would go to the Post Office and come home with that check. She didn't know how it would happen; she only knew that it
would happen.
I find this particular comment of your especially interesting in this light:
Originally Posted by Edwin
What I am missing from your story is how your wife was so sure.
|
That is I think, the very reason so many people who try some sort of LOA/manifestion work get at best inconsistent results. That degree of quasi-certainty seems likely to be a critical key in making it all work, and few of us ever get to that point of feeling the certainty so deeply as is necessary. Instead, most of us wish, or hope, but we can't really call what we feel a sense of absolute, metaphysical certitude. If there was only some practical way we could trigger that sort of "knowing"...
Perhaps the field of quantum theory holds a key to this and other manifestation events. It's well established now that at least on a sub-atomic level, our observation of events and our expectations as to what we might see when we observe exert a direct influence over the outcome of whatever process it is we're observing. Maybe what is needed is a methodical way to affect tiny things first and then larger things in graduated steps as we gain confidence until we reach the point at which we can manifest whatever we want, whenever we want it on command. It's safe to say no one has reached that point as yet or they would already have manifest a world in which successful, responsible manifestation is the rule for everyone rather than the hit and miss approach currently in vogue.